Key Question: How can nationalist loyalties create conflict?
When people's choices enable them to include more than one nationalist loyalty in their identity, these loyalties are compatible - they can coexist without conflicting. If you are a new Canadian citizen, for example, you might feel a strong loyalty to Canada at the same time as you feel a strong loyalty to your original homeland. You might show these loyalties by choosing both to keep up with the news from your country of origin and to attend a Canada Day celebration. Your two loyalties can coexist without causing you turmoil.
But nationalist loyalties are not always compatible. Their goals sometimes conflict. If you feel a strong loyalty to Canada at the same time as you feel a strong loyalty to Quebec - and your loyalty to Quebec lead you to believe that the province should become independent - you would have a hard time making choices that would satisfy both these loyalties.
But nationalist loyalties are not always compatible. Their goals sometimes conflict. If you feel a strong loyalty to Canada at the same time as you feel a strong loyalty to Quebec - and your loyalty to Quebec lead you to believe that the province should become independent - you would have a hard time making choices that would satisfy both these loyalties.
Examples
July 1st - Newfoundland
Across the country, Canadians celebrate Canada Day in different ways. The celebrations vary from serious and patriotic to wild and wacky. But things are different for many Newfoundlanders. When they wake up on July 1, some may plan to attend a Canada Day celebration - but they may also plan to attend Memorial Day ceremonies.
During the World War 1 Battle of Beaumont-Hamel, Newfoundland was a self-governing British dominion that had not yet joined Canada. The Newfoundland Regiment was nearly wiped out in this battle, which is as symbolic for Newfoundlanders as Vimy Ridge is for other Canadians |
Israel
Contending nationalist loyalties can create conflict between peoples for many reasons. When two people, for example, want to live in the same territory can cannot reconcile - settle or resolve - their conflicting loyalties by diplomatic means, the result may be violence. This is the case in Israel, where both Jewish Israelis and Palestinians wish to control the same territory, to which both have historical, religious, spiritual, cultural, and geographic ties.
|
Quebec
Quebecois have a long history of grappling with contending nationalist loyalties. In 1995, a referendum on separating from Canada forced them to choose between their loyalty to Quebec and their loyalty to Canada. An extraordinary 93.5% of Quebecois voted in this referendum. The results, in which the no side eked out a narrow victory, revealed that voters were nearly equally divided over how to reconcile these contending loyalties.
|
Aboriginal Reconciliation
Reconciliation can mean coming to terms with the past or mending a broken relationship. When two friends have a serious disagreement, an act of reconciliation can help resolve their differences and bring them together again. Similarly, when peoples or nations disagree, or when their nationalist loyalties lead them to pursue contending goals, an attitude of reconciliation can bring them together and enable them to coexist in peace. But when two contending nations cannot achieve reconciliation, the outcome can be serious. The inability to resolve differences may lead to damaging political struggles and even outright war.
For decades, Canadian governments tried to force First Nations, Inuit, and Metis to abandon their culture and traditions and to assimilate into mainstream society. Over the past decades, this policy has changed, as governments have recognized Aboriginal and treaty rights. But although these rights are now enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, many First Nations, Inuit, and Metis continue to face an uphill struggle in their quest to control their own destiny.
For decades, Canadian governments tried to force First Nations, Inuit, and Metis to abandon their culture and traditions and to assimilate into mainstream society. Over the past decades, this policy has changed, as governments have recognized Aboriginal and treaty rights. But although these rights are now enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, many First Nations, Inuit, and Metis continue to face an uphill struggle in their quest to control their own destiny.
The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples
|
Land Claims
|